calender_icon.png 9 June, 2025 | 12:15 PM

GHMC writes to High Court on euthanasia for Canines

09-02-2025 12:00:00 AM

According to the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules-2023, only incurably ill and mortally wounded street dogs are being euthanized

Metro India News | Hyderabad 

The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) has sought permission from the Telangana High Court to carry out euthanasia on aggressive stray dogs, citing public safety concerns. GHMC Commissioner K. Ilambarithi emphasized that sterilization alone is insufficient to curb the violent behaviour of certain animals, posing a growing threat to citizens, especially vulnerable groups like children.

In an affidavit filed before the court, Ilambarithi outlined the persistent dangers posed by aggressive stray dogs, despite significant investments in sterilization programs and collaborations with animal welfare organizations. He noted that disadvantaged communities, particularly in slums, are disproportionately affected by the rising number of attacks.

According to the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules-2023, only incurably ill and mortally wounded street dogs are being euthanized. The corporation is also conducting mass sterilization and anti-rabies vaccination campaigns through five ABC centers, involving 18 veterinarians, 22 para-veterinarians, and 49 specialized dog-catching vehicles, as mentioned in the affidavit.

Ilambarithi pointed out that while sterilization programs have helped reduce the overall stray dog population, they do not address the aggression displayed by some animals. He compared the situation to international practices, referencing laws in countries such as the UK and the US, where euthanasia is permitted for dangerous stray dogs.

Specifically, he cited the UK’s Environmental Protection Act of 1990, which allows for the humane euthanasia of unclaimed dogs that pose serious risks to public safety. Ilambarithi suggested that India could adopt similar measures within the framework of existing animal welfare laws.

Several dog lovers and organizations, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and local animal welfare groups, oppose this move, advocating for more compassionate approaches such as better sterilization, vaccination, and rehabilitation programs.

Critics argue that the stray dog problem is due to municipal authorities' failure to effectively implement sterilization and vaccination programs. They believe these initiatives would reduce both the population and aggression of stray dogs. The debate continues as the GHMC awaits the court's decision, with strong opinions on both sides regarding the best approach to ensure public safety while addressing the welfare of stray animals.